Which method uses feet and natural markers to describe land?

The method that employs feet and natural markers to describe land is known as metes and bounds. This system originated in England and is commonly used in the United States, particularly in areas that were settled before the establishment of a more systematic land survey method.

Metes refer to the measurement of distances and angles, often expressed in feet, while bounds refer to the physical features of the terrain, such as trees, rivers, and roads, which act as boundaries. This method allows for a detailed description of a property’s perimeter based on precise measurements and identifiable landmarks.

In contrast, the lot and block system uses a pre-existing subdivision map, the rectangular survey system involves dividing land into a grid using meridians and baselines, and the subdivision plat provides a map that delineates specific parcels of land, which may not include the same level of detail around natural features. Therefore, metes and bounds remains the appropriate choice for describing land using both measurement and natural markers.